Journalism in the service of society

ONDO: Lawmakers to continue impeachment proceedings against deputy governor

THE Ondo State House of Assembly has vowed to proceed with impeachment procedures against the state’s Deputy Governor, Lucky Aiyedatiwa despite a lawsuit filed by him.

Aiyedatiwa had petitioned an Akure High Court to halt the House of Assembly’s impeachment plans against him.

However, in a statement signed by the Speaker of the House, Rt. Hon. Oladiji Olamide Adesanmi, lawmakers have assured the public that the legislative process would be carried out to its logical end while adhering strictly to constitutional norms.

The House said it “will not abdicate or compromise its sacred constitutional duty to hold elected public officers accountable, particularly where there are prima facie serious allegations of corruption and abuse of power levelled against the Deputy Governor in this case.”

To back its decision to proceed with the impeachment process, the House referred to the case of Abaribe V. Abia State House of Assembly (2022) 14 NWLR (Pt. 788) 466, where it noted that the Court of Appeal emphatically stated that it was wrong for the Appellant to jump the gun by rushing to the Court to stop his impeachment process on the ground of alleged breach of fair hearing when the panel to investigate and hear him had not even been constituted.

“The Court of Appeal then restated that by the provision of Section 188 (10) of the Constitution, no court has the jurisdiction at that stage to interfere in the legislative proceedings for impeachment.

“The Supreme Court has repeatedly restated that the Court can only intervene when the procedures for impeachment have been breached. In this case however, the Deputy Governor rushed to court even before the notice of impeachment was served on him. For the records, no procedures have been breached in any way.

“In view of these, the House has directed its team of Lawyers to investigate the purported injunction secured by the Deputy Governor and report any judicial officer who might have abused his office in granting the unconstitutional ex-parte injunction to the appropriate institution for necessary disciplinary action,” the statement said.

Comments are closed.